SR&ED 2026 Changes: What Consultants Need to Know
July 25, 2026 · SREDlog · 8 min read
The 2026 SR&ED changes are the biggest shake-up to the program in over a decade. For years the rules barely moved; a consultant's first-year training still held by their tenth. That changed in 2026, when Bill C-15 carried into law the largest set of changes since the 2012 budget stripped capital expenditures out of the program (canada.ca). If you file claims for Canadian companies, several land on real files this season.
The 2026 SR&ED changes at a glance
- Enhanced 35% refundable credit limit: $3 million → $6 million of qualified expenditure (maximum refundable credit rises from about $1.05 million to $2.1 million).
- Taxable-capital phase-out for that limit: widened from $10 million–$50 million to $15 million–$75 million.
- Capital expenditures: eligible again for property acquired on or after December 16, 2024 (the full cost earns the ITC, but only 40% of that credit is refundable, against 100% on current expenditures).
- The enhanced rate now reaches certain eligible Canadian public corporations, not just CCPCs.
- A new elective pre-claim approval process, live April 1, 2026.
- Effective for taxation years beginning on or after December 16, 2024.
Here is what each change means, and where it touches the work.
The enhanced credit now runs to $6 million
The headline number is the expenditure limit: the amount of qualified SR&ED expenditure on which a Canadian-controlled private corporation earns the enhanced 35% refundable investment tax credit. It moved from $3 million to $6 million, which raises the maximum annual refundable credit from roughly $1.05 million to $2.1 million (KPMG, Miller Thomson).
One wrinkle worth flagging to junior staff: the number arrived in two steps. The December 2024 Fall Economic Statement proposed $4.5 million; Budget 2025 raised it to $6 million before it was legislated. A lot of secondhand commentary online still quotes $4.5 million, so in any technical narrative or client memo use $6 million and check the effective date against the client's year end.
The grind widened too. The expenditure limit gets reduced based on the prior year's taxable capital, and that phase-out range moved from $10 million to $50 million up to a new range of $15 million to $75 million (KPMG). More of your mid-size clients keep more of the enhanced rate than they would have a year ago.
All of this applies to taxation years that begin on or after December 16, 2024.
The jump matters most for one band of clients: the ones that were already pressing against the old $3 million ceiling. Take an illustrative firm spending $2.8 million on eligible work. Under the old limit it had nearly maxed out the enhanced rate; now it earns the full 35% refundable credit on more than double that spend. For a client well under $3 million, the change is theoretical. Sort your book by which side of that line each client sat on, and the new headroom shows up fast.
Capital expenditures are back
From 2014 on, capital property was out. You could not claim the cost of equipment bought to carry out SR&ED, and a generation of consultants built their intake habits around that fact. That exclusion is now reversed. Capital expenditures on depreciable property used in SR&ED are eligible again for property acquired on or after December 16, 2024. Watch how the refundability works, because it is not the same as current expenditures: the full acquisition cost earns the ITC, but only 40% of the resulting credit is refundable, where current expenditures are 100% refundable up to the expenditure limit (Miller Thomson).
This one is easy to miss, because the reflex to ignore capital is a decade deep. If a client bought a test rig, a prototype line, or lab equipment in a year that begins after the cutoff, that cost is back in scope. It is worth a direct question on every intake call now: what did you buy to do this work?
Picture a hardware startup that spends $200,000 on an environmental test chamber to run experiments on a new sensor (an illustrative figure). Under the old rules that purchase earned nothing through SR&ED. Now, if it was acquired in a year that begins after the cutoff, the full $200,000 earns the ITC at the 35% enhanced rate, a credit of $70,000. Of that, 40%, or $28,000, comes back as cash; the remaining $42,000 is a non-refundable credit against tax payable, carried forward if there is no tax to absorb it. Quote the client the whole $70,000 and explain the split, because the cash figure alone understates what the purchase is worth. To stand behind it, keep the same trail you would for any expenditure: the invoice, evidence the equipment was used in experimental work rather than routine production, and a clear link from the asset to the project in the technical narrative.
Public corporations can qualify for the enhanced rate
The 35% refundable credit used to belong to CCPCs alone. The 2026 changes extend it to certain eligible Canadian public corporations: broadly, corporations resident in Canada, listed on a designated stock exchange, and not controlled by non-residents. Their expenditure limit grinds down on revenue rather than on taxable capital, over the same $15 million to $75 million band (KPMG). If you have turned away public-company work because the enhanced rate was off the table, that math has changed. It is a small slice of most boutique practices, but worth knowing the door is open.
Pre-claim approval: certainty before the work starts
The change that alters workflow rather than arithmetic is administrative. On April 1, 2026, the CRA launched a pre-claim approval process (canada.ca). It is elective, so you can keep filing the traditional way. What it offers is a determination on eligibility before a client starts the work or spends the money.
The mechanics, from the CRA's own notice:
- It is open to Canadian-controlled private corporations, Canadian corporations, and Canadian partnerships with annual gross income under $25 million.
- You apply through My Business Account, and the CRA aims to return a determination within eight weeks.
- For an approved project that later needs an expenditure review, processing time drops from 180 days to 90.
- An approval holds for up to three years.
For a nervous first-time claimant, an eligibility answer in writing before they commit budget is a different sales conversation than "we think this qualifies." It also front-loads the eligibility argument, which is where most of the audit risk lives anyway.
My read: pre-claim approval earns its keep in a narrow set of cases and is overhead everywhere else. It is worth the effort for a first-time claimant who needs a yes before spending, for a project sitting on the eligibility line where a determination de-risks the whole file, and for a client whose board wants certainty before it commits budget. For a seasoned claimant running work that has cleared review before, the eight-week wait is mostly cost, so file the normal way. Its quiet value is forcing the eligibility argument to the front, where it belongs.
What to do before the next filing
Re-run the numbers on any client that was sitting near the old $3 million ceiling. Some of them were leaving the enhanced rate on the table and no longer are.
Add a capital question to your intake. The habit of skipping it is a decade old and now wrong for years that begin after the cutoff.
Watch the effective dates. Almost everything here keys to taxation years beginning on or after December 16, 2024, so a client with an early-2024 year end is still under the old rules for that year. Getting the year end wrong is the easiest way to misstate a credit in a narrative.
Keep the evidence discipline. Bigger credits and restored capital do not change the standard the reviewer applies; the claim still has to hold up line by line. Firms that capture contemporaneous evidence as the work happens spend far less time reconstructing it at filing, and that reconstruction has always been the slow part of the job. It is the part SREDlog was built to take off your desk.
Frequently asked questions
When do the 2026 SR&ED changes take effect?
They apply to taxation years that begin on or after December 16, 2024. A client with a year end early in 2024 is still under the old rules for that year, so the client's fiscal year end decides which regime applies.
What is the new SR&ED expenditure limit for 2026?
The enhanced 35% refundable credit is now earned on up to $6 million of qualified expenditure, up from $3 million. That lifts the maximum annual refundable credit from roughly $1.05 million to $2.1 million.
Can you claim capital expenditures for SR&ED again?
Yes. Depreciable property acquired on or after December 16, 2024 is eligible again, reversing the exclusion that applied to property acquired after 2013. The refundability differs from current expenditures, though: the full acquisition cost earns the investment tax credit, but only 40% of that credit is refundable, where current expenditures are 100% refundable up to the expenditure limit. The rest is a non-refundable credit against tax payable.
Do public companies qualify for the 35% SR&ED credit now?
Certain eligible Canadian public corporations can now access the enhanced 35% refundable rate. Broadly, that means corporations resident in Canada, listed on a designated stock exchange, and not controlled by non-residents. Their expenditure limit is reduced based on revenue rather than taxable capital. It was previously limited to Canadian-controlled private corporations.
What is SR&ED pre-claim approval?
It is an elective CRA process, live since April 1, 2026, that gives eligible businesses (under $25 million in annual gross income) a determination on whether their work qualifies before they start. For approved projects that later need an expenditure review, processing drops from 180 to 90 days, and an approval holds for up to three years.
The program got more generous, and with pre-claim approval it got a little more predictable. Proving a claim did not get any easier. That gap is still where a good consultant earns the fee.
Ready to prepare a well-supported SR&ED claim?
SREDlog connects your evidence to drafted forms and an indexed review package.
Related reading
Provincial SR&ED credits compared: ON, BC, QC, AB
Quebec abolished its SR&ED credit and Alberta will not follow Bill C-15. What Ontario, BC, Quebec and Alberta actually pay in 2026, with sources.
ReadWhat qualifies for SR&ED in software development?
CRA has no software-specific SR&ED policy. What the two eligibility requirements actually demand of a software claim, and where most teams get it wrong.
ReadCan you claim SR&ED if your project failed?
Yes. CRA states success or failure is not relevant to eligibility, and a rejected hypothesis can count as an advancement. What actually matters instead.
Read